Featured Columnists
Michael Reagan
Bill Steigerwald
Martha Randolph Carr
Will Durst
Tom Purcell
Floyd & Mary Beth Brown

Firefighter Case Shows Seamy Side Of Racial Politics
Markets Crash on Pictures of Obama Losing Shirt Shirtless President-Elect Creates Crisis of Confidence
Mission Not Accomplished In Iraq, But It's Coming Soon
One Last Chance
For Obama, Court Cases That Matter
Hands Off Honduras!
Sotomayor And Quotas
'45 Million Americans' -- Who Are Those Guys? Part 3
Erbe: Obama And The End Of Affirmative Action
Thriller
But for the grace of God ...
Lobbyists On A Roll: Gutting Reform On Banking, Energy, And Health Care
A Letter To Sarah
A Health-Care Greeting: Welcome To Wal-Mart
GOP Leaders Turn Opposition Into Obstinancy
New Haven Shows We Haven't Learned
Justice Department: U.S. Border 'Underprotected,' 'Easily Breached'
Unalienable Rights Include Decent Potato Salad
'W' Is For Withdrawal
'Reconciliation' To Pass Health Bill Won't Work
The Meaning Of Ricci
GOP Discovers A Taxing Issue
Abuse In Jails Makes Life A Prison
Finally, A Bipartisan Topic: Sex Scandals
4th Of July Dialogue: Dude And Uncle Sam
Welcome To Obamacare Theater
Why We Secretly Love Earmarks
Scripps Howard News ServiceConsolidated Budget
Republicans: Stand Your Ground
Murdock: Green-Energy Tax Cuts Over Cap-And-Trade
Wrong Again
On Terror 'No-Fly' List, But Still Buying Guns
'I Made A Mistake' Excuse Getting Flimsier By The Minute
See This Film (Or Stop Complaining About Hollywood)
The Big 60: Use It Or Lose It!
Happy Anniversary, Title IX! Now What?
Minutemen's Fifteen Minutes Are Just About Up
Disability, Inc.
The System is Evil, Not Madoff
Farrah Wasn't Like Us, Until She Was
Against "Government-Run" Health Care
Why Steele Just Doesn't Get It
The Honduras Predicament
Iraq Is Victorious ... Over The 'Foreign' U.S.?
What shall I do with the rest of my life?
Sweden's Government Health Care
The Republican Blame Game



West180.jpg
Jimmy Carter Makes Me Sick
Diana West 4/22/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook

In mustering arguments against Jimmy Carter's head-to-head, if not heart-to-heart, get-togethers with the arch-murderers of Hamas -- the Iranian-supported, Muslim Brotherhood-linked terror organization openly dedicated to the annihilation of the state of Israel -- it becomes clear that these disastrous meetings aren't a question of misunderstood or overlooked facts, or a matter of persuasion based on such facts. They come down to a stark choice between evil and good: to meet with Hamas, or not to meet with Hamas; to lend legitimacy to a terror group, or to shun it; to degrade the office of the presidency, or to honor it. Jimmy Carter has made all the wrong choices.

The horror of it all comes from the fact that Carter, as a former president of the United States, doesn't choose in the anonymity of a private person. With lifelong recognition for his permanent, if dubious, place in American history, he makes his immoral choice as a venerable representative of the presidency, indeed, as an enduring symbol of the nation.

It was as such a symbol that the former president hugged a former Hamas official at a reception in Ramallah on
Tuesday. Unfortunately, Carter didn't arrive in time for last Friday's sermon, delivered by a Hamas cleric and MP, and translated by MEMRI. It called for Islamic conquest, first of Rome -- "the Crusader capital, which has declared its hostility to Islam, and planted the brothers of apes and pigs in Palestine (Koranic motifs describing Jews) in order to prevent the reawakening of Islam," and then "Europe in its entirety ... the two Americas and even Eastern Europe."

He could have hugged that Hamas official, too.

And it was as such a symbol that the former president, along with wife, Rosalynn, the former first lady, visited the grave of Yasser Arafat, the founding father of global terrorism, who, in his time on Earth, watered it with the blood of innocents, including that of two American diplomats he ordered assassinated in 1973 in Sudan. Did the thought of all this blood temper Mr. Carter's enthusiasm? Hailing Arafat's "historic role," the 39th president of the United States laid a wreath of red -- red -- roses on the terrorist's grave, calling him a "dear friend."

Too bad a column can't come with a sick bag.

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
Jimmy Carter and Hamas
By Nate Beeler - The Washington Examiner * Posted 4/21/2008 12:00:00 AM
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
Jimmy Carter and Hamas
© Copyright 2008  Nate Beeler - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: Dauric  on Tuesday, April 22, 2008

The problem is that no-one ever sees themselves as the evil ones, it's always someone else that is the evildoer.

I agree that Hamas is an evil organization, their rhetoric and their tactics, to everyone else in the world are abhorrent.

The problem is how do you actually -solve- the problem of any particular instance of evil? Sure we can isolate them and cut them off from any support, but that doesn't do anything but bolster our feelings of moral superiority, but they still -exist-; their instance of evil will continue to exist. Isolating them only feeds their paranoia, and bolsters the propaganda that brings people of the region to their side by proving them right.

Remember Hamas was -elected- to rule. They have gained popular support.

Adolf Hitler was evil but dealing with him was relatively simple, European culture, like America, is based heavily on the idea of the Nation. Crush the German army and you have the ability to bring the Nazi party to justice.

(Well what'dy know, I broke the thread before it even started...)

Japan had strong ties of honor and service, and the Emperor was a god, even up to WWII. The only way to stop the invasion of Japan from being a bloodbath was to leave no doubt that continued struggle would obliterate  the people of Japan one way or another, and that obliteration would come without the ability to honorably fight back. Facing that kind of threat the Japanese emperor had only one responsible path before him, surrender.

Now the question is how do we solve the evil in the middle east? The people of that area are bound by ethnicity, clan and family rather than by national borders so we cannot simply invade their territory as their territory will shift like sand around the invaders. Their honor and obligation ties ensure that if we find the leadership and remove them half a dozen of their siblings and other relatives are obligated to take their place. Worst yet is that their (some argue perversely mutated) religion makes them immune to the prospect of death, even immune to the fear of being massacred wholesale. After all, anyone not just a fighter, who dies in the cause of Allah will go to heaven.

So now how do we -solve- the problem? There seem to be two options left:

(1) Negotiate with them, get them to change their tactics and rhetoric little-by-little until they are no longer afflicted by this evil.

(2) Nuke them so hard the sand beneath their feet turns to glass.

I'm not saying one is preferable to the other, just that nothing else seems to have worked.

$0.02


Posted By: Uncle Ernie  on Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Other than shit what do you use for brains? I'm sure your puppet masters in Tel Aviv are proud of you but I bet your mama isn't. I'm guessing you got paid the traditional 30 pieces of silver by your Zionazi masters?

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:

 





© Cagle Cartoons, Inc., All Rights Reserved; Artwork and Columns © each respective artist and writer. [Privacy Policy]