The Battle of The Party Themes
It's Still The Economy, Stupid
Poll: Obama Faring Poorly Among Racists
Palin's No Shrinking Violet
Danger Signals
Change vs. Change
Obama Off-Balance from Palin Flip-Flops on O'Reilly
Distant Drums At Sarah's Party
Taking the Pulse
Game Changer
The Unexamined Life
The Grand Old Party Line
JFK: Democrats' Role Model?
Palin, Pregnancy And The Pulpit
The Big 5-0
What Do Women Want Now?
Farewell To An American Hero
Palin-Bashing Press Keeps Swinging And Missing
Want Real Change? Quit Nominating Lawyers!
Harper's Index
Don't They Have Birth Control Up In Alaska?
Professor Bush's Economic Nostrum
Saving The GOP And The Unbearable Lightness of Being Sarah Palin
Building The Bridge
Married Liberals With Children
Mosdirection In Minnesota
Logical Consequencse
Which Ticket Really Will Deliver Change Voters Want?
Palin's Problem
Game On: Let The Race Begin
The Rush Is On For Palin, GOP
The Role of A Lifetime
What's So Terrific About Mccain's Palin Pick?
Why Obama's "Community Organizer" Days Are A Joke
A.S.P. -- After Sarah Palin
Democrats In Trouble
McCain-Palin Will Flush Big-Spending GOP Ways
Most Sarcastic Campaign Ever
Report From A Forgotten War (5th and Last in a Series)
My Brain Tumor
Don't 'Misunderestimate' Palin's Power
Words On Words: How Do You Say 'Hypocrisy' In Romney-Speak?
On Shooting Taggers: Why Conservatives And Liberals Differ
Mccain Wants Moose Hunter In White House
Me For President
Welcome Back Dad
A Human-Resources Handbook
Palin's Gender Alone Won't Sway Women Voters
Romancing The Vote
Palin's State Reaps The Windfall Profits McCain Decries
One Blessing of A Life
Debates Count More Than Running Mates
Media To Republicans: We're Sorry
Executive Experience Is a Joke -- Opinion
What Standards?
Blind Defense of Koran Abrogates Reality
We've Come A Long Way, Baby
Are You Better Off ?
The Invisible President



Brown180a.jpg
Activist Judges Gone Wild
Floyd and Mary Beth Brown 5/21/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook

Activist Judges Gone Wild

By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown

Who says judges aren’t a big deal? One needs only to look at California’s Supreme Court May 15 ruling on same-sex marriage to see the ramifications of judicial nominations. Those judges were even audacious enough to overturn a proposition vote by the state’s citizens. This decision in California by activist judges gone wild is a prime example of what John McCain means by judicial activism.

“It will fall to the next president to nominate hundreds of qualified men and women to the federal courts, and the choices we make will reach far into the future,” McCain said about the importance of judicial nominations.

McCain articulated the philosophy he will use in appointing Supreme Court justices while speaking May 6, 2000 in North Carolina. Senator McCain’s judicial philosophy centers around a “strict interpretation of the Constitution” and opposition to “judicial activism,” writes The Wall Street Journal. The senator took aim at the Supreme Court decision in 2005 on the Kelo eminent domain case. McCain called the decision a “power play” that “actually got the constitutional ‘thumbs-up’ from five members of the Supreme Court.”

“Real activism in our country is democratic,” McCain said in his assault on judicial activism.
Continuing, he clarified the difference between “real activists” with “activist lawyers and activist judges”: Activist judges, “Don’t seek to win debates on the merits of their arguments; they seek to shut down debates by order of the court.” McCain described the kinds of candidates he would nominate to the high court – ones whom he could be certain of their “ability, wisdom, and demonstrated fidelity to the Constitution.” In contrast, McCain explained Barack Obama would choose judges based on their ability to be empathetic.

However, the thought of Senator McCain in the driver’s seat of judicial appointments is a touchy subject for social conservatives. Some believe he has not gone far enough on sweeping issues encompassing everything from abortion and religion, to gun and free speech rights.

When it comes to judges, McCain said in January, “It’s not social issues I care about. It’s the Constitution of the United States.” By itself, this is something most conservatives actually agree with, but there is still a legitimate cause for concern. On a positive note, McCain has praised justices Antonin Scalia, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito. Nevertheless, according to Curt Levey, director of a conservative advocacy group: “He’s been strong on judges, but he still has something to prove.”

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
Gay Marriage in California Color
By Daryl Cagle - MSNBC.com * Posted 05/19/2008
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
Gay Marriage in California Color
© Copyright 2008  Daryl Cagle - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: Dauric  on Thursday, May 22, 2008

When did the Republican party becomes such a bunch of whiners? I am a Republican and I notice that the party I belong to is represented by people who whine.

"Activist Judges". I don't think I've ever heard a Democrat say that, and frankly it grinds my gears that any judge a republican doesn't agree with is "Activist", like they're wearing tie-dyed robes and flower garlands. It's not like there's been no conservative activist judges favoring private corporations. What? You mean you haven't heard of the Kelo case regarding eminent domain, where a home was taken from private citizens to give to a private corporation, because the taxes were better from the corporation? Yeah, Activist Republican Judges ran roughshod over the fourth amendment's protections against unlawful seizure.

Here I reference the comments section of Dennis Prager's last article here, wile an unscientific survey to be sure, the vast majority of people either support gay marriage rights as part of a legal contract, or don't care.

Those of us who don't care one way or the other, think that the Republican Party would be better served by their "Traditional Platform" of fiscal sobriety and limited government, rather than attempting to inject government and religion in to bedrooms across the United States.

Do we really have nothing better to do as a people? Has the federal budget been balanced without anyone being told? The National Debt must be gone and the value of the dollar will return to it's accustomed heights so we can all buy gas at reasonable rates?

No? It hasn't? So... Gas is still around $4.00 a gallon huh? And electric cars still aren't in showrooms ready to buy?

No? Well, for this much outrage to be directed at a judicial ruling that affects 4% to 10% of the population (depending on the study you cite, some go as low as 1% or 2%) then many of the more outrageous injustices in our society must have been rectified right? College Tuitions are now based on the pay for the kinds of jobs you can get with hat degree and the demand for people to be in that field, rather than simply being a number that was higher than it was last term? No? Ohh, I know, the mortgage debacle has been rectified. Not that either? Ahh, corporate laws have been rectified and the Enron and Tyco scandals could never happen again. Still no huh?

Well, I'm running out of things to be outraged about since none of the previous stuff has been fixed yet, My outrage is all booked up on more immediate, important and wide-reaching injustices.



$0.02

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:

 





© Cagle Cartoons, Inc., All Rights Reserved; Artwork and Columns © each respective artist and writer.