No Permanent Majorities In America
Cartoony Politics in Canada
Being President 101
Failure To Blow Election Stuns Democratic Party Faithful Mourn End To Losing Tradition
Hope Is On The Way
The Future Is Upon Us
Illinois Outdoes Itself
Environmentalists Disregard Public Safety
There's Something About Harry
The White Collar Lament
What Good Can Come Of This?
Dummies
If The Shoe Fits Hurl It
Obama The Magic Negro-Gate
Sick Of The Doom And Gloom?
Crazy Like A Fox
Out With The Old
Remember The Empty Chairs At Holiday Tables
Who Are The Real Nazis?
The Gaza Rules
Harper's Weekly
The Mortgage Thieves Return
Bringing A Bit Of Fairness To The American Workplace
Bye-Bye 2008: Things I Want To Forget
The Fierce Urgency Of Now
How Many Government Workers Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?
The Perils And Joys Of Self-Esteem
The Future Of Civilization
'Hunk' Obama Can Help Nation Fight Obesity Epidemic
Moral Clarity In Gaza
Obama's Tax Cuts Leave Logic Behind
Talking About Sex-Ed That Works
The Time Is Now
Et Al Ad Nauseam: 2008 And All That
The Generational Theft Act Of 2009
Pay Rod Gives Democrats Fits With Senate Choice
'Tis The Season To Be Jolly. Or At least Try
Gaza: The Dove'S War
Hamas Rockets Blew Away Gaza Opportunity
Season's Readings
Old Acquaintances
A Social Trauma For Obama: Youth Crime
Sensitivity And 'Gran Torino'
A Question For My Friend Alan Dershowitz
The Unsung Hero Of Obama'S Victory
Red Ink Did Me Good
Barack in Limbo
A Hard Year Ahead
Ask Not For Plum Political Appointments
Eric Holder And All Political Prisoners
Mideast Overshadows Obama's Prospects
A Clean Start
Year-End Odds And Ends
Team Obama Dabbles In Drama
The Gamble in Gaza -- Interview With Aaron David Miller
Cal Thomas-Bonus
A Respite From Reality
One Nation, One People-God Bless Us Everyone
Dr. Leavitt's Scary Diagnosis
Rich People Versus Politicians
Richardson's Exit And The Vetting Process



About That New New Deal
Mona Charen 11/28/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook

"This is the best deal since 1932." So said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) regarding the increased public appetite for government intervention in the economy. Incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel echoed the sentiment when he told the Wall Street Journal, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."

Oh, boy. While Barack Obama's appointments so far have been fairly moderate, other Democrats are whistling "Happy Days are Here Again" and dusting off their wish lists for federal spending. "The House and Senate Appropriations committees hope to use December to negotiate a $410 billion omnibus measure that can be swiftly approved when the new Congress convenes," reports the Politico. Wasn't it just two months ago that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi — supposedly outraged that the Congress was being asked (by Bush and Paulson) to pony up $700 billion to prevent a total freeze of credit markets around the globe — intoned "SEVEN HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS." She repeated it for emphasis: "Madame Speaker, when was the last time anyone ever asked you for SEVEN HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS? It's a staggering figure."

But that was then. Now the cover of TIME magazine features Obama as FDR and the term "new New Deal" is on everyone's lips. Columnist Paul Krugman is fine with that, except he objects that
Roosevelt didn't do enough!

The conventional wisdom has had a rough time of it lately among scholars. You know the fairy tale. You were probably taught it in school. During the 1920s, America practiced laissez-faire economics. The 1920s were seen, as historian Amity Shlaes put it, as a period of "false growth and low morals." Greedy businessmen got out of control and created a market crash in 1929. President Hoover, obedient to Republican ideas concerning noninterference in the market, did nothing. The economy spiraled into a depression. Roosevelt was elected in 1932, banished fear, inaugurated the New Deal, and put America back to work.

A series of recent books has demolished the myth.

Some of Roosevelt's reforms were salutary (the Securities and Exchange Commission, reform of the Federal Reserve) but the New Deal's chief object was never achieved — it did not solve the nation's unemployment problem. The CATO Institute's Jim Powell points out in "FDR's Folly," "From 1934 to 1940, the median annual unemployment rate was 17.2. At no point during the 1930s did unemployment go below 14 percent. ... Living standards remained depressed until after the war." Stanford University history professor David Kennedy has acknowledged, "Whatever it was, the New Deal was not a recovery program, or at any rate not an effective one."

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
Franklin Delano Obama
By John Darkow - Columbia Daily Tribune, Missouri * Posted 11/12/2008 12:00:00 AM
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
Franklin Delano Obama
© Copyright 2008  John Darkow - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: John Handforth  on Friday, November 28, 2008

A little history... Will it happen again?

Hoover gets bashed because he was our President when the stock market crashed in 1929.  The market crashed for reasons very similar to what we have today.  There were millions of small investors working the market in 1929, with more than half of them buying stock on margin.  In other words, they were buying stock with money that they didn't have.  That worked well when the stock value was rising.  You'd pledge to buy 100 shares at a dollar, planning to sell when it reached two dollars.  When it did reach your goal, you'd pay the $100 that you owed, plus a $5 margin fee and still make $95 using money that you never had.

When the stocks began to tumble, the stockbrokers put out margin calls demanding that the stocks be paid for.  No one had the money and it all collapsed like a house of cards.

Banking regulations and the SEC were created and/or expanded in the 1930's to keep the same thing from happening again.  Most of those regulations were created under FDR.  Other industries came under Federal oversight during the Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations.

Then we were stabilized until Carter took office.

Carter had no malice in his heart.  He thought that deregulaion would lower prices by increasing competition.  It actually worked when he deregulated the airline industry, so he then required lending institutions to lower their standards somewhat to allow people with somewhat bad credit history to obtain mortgages.  That was a noble idea, and actually did work in many cases.  Many of the people that obtained these loans were so grateful that they paid their mortgage before they put food on the table.  The banks did get a pleasant surprise on that one, but those people did have jobs and only needed a jumpstart with their credit history.

I changed homes after my job transfer and got stuck with a mortgage at almost 12%.  All other home buyers were subsidizing the risky loans.  Do you remember those times?  They guaranteed Reagan's election.

Reagan didn't fight deregulation.  He expanded it, just as Daddy Bush did after him.  It was Clinton, though, who wanted more minority home owners, so he deregulated the lending industry and removed most of the oversight.  He rerscinded the Banking Act of 1933.

Anyone with bad credit could now buy a home as long as they could show earnings for a few consecutive weeks.

With little or no regulation, lenders created new financial schemes, such as ARM's and sub-prime mortgages.  Initially people were able to pay their mortgages.  They might have struggled, but most of them managed it.  Then their rates went up.  Eventually, many of them had to refinance.  That wasn't a problem in a rising market.  It was just like the stock market in 1929.

Bush Junior has made a lot of mistakes, but deregulation was not one of them.  There was practically nothing left to deregulate by the time that he took office.  He even tried to put some control on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in his first term, but Barney Frank stated the Fannie and Freddie were in good shape and providing a service to the poor.  Bush's effort was squashed.

With the markets falling as they are, people are unable to refinance.  My own kid wouldn't listen and has refinanced twice.  I don't know what they will do if the real estate market doesn't recover.

I don't see that happening for quite some time because unemployment is a lot higher than the published figures.  My benefits ran out several years ago and I have been draining my savings since then.  I filed for Social Security ten days before my 62nd birthday.  Due to my age, and a poor local economy, I am unable to find anything except part time seasonal work.  I don't count as unemployed and there are thousands more like me.

Both candidates voted for the bailout.  I think that they agreed to do that, so as not to create another campaign issue.  Were they wrong? Only history will say for sure, but it never worked for Roosevelt.  He was saved by World War Two.  We will always wonder if we totally ignored military intelligence prior to Pearl Harbor, but a million soldiers out of the work force sure cured the unemployment problem.

I hope that President Obama can bring the troops home from the Middle East, HONORABLY, and put the troops to work closer to home.

If you ran your home, or business, like the government has been run for the last eighty years, you'd be thrown in jail.

Let's not go there...

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:

 
Please contact your local newspaper editor if you would like to see the Mona Charen column in your hometown paper.





© Cagle Cartoons, Inc., All Rights Reserved; Artwork and Columns © each respective artist and writer.