No Permanent Majorities In America
Cartoony Politics in Canada
Being President 101
Failure To Blow Election Stuns Democratic Party Faithful Mourn End To Losing Tradition
Hope Is On The Way
The Future Is Upon Us
Illinois Outdoes Itself
Environmentalists Disregard Public Safety
There's Something About Harry
The White Collar Lament
What Good Can Come Of This?
Dummies
If The Shoe Fits Hurl It
Obama The Magic Negro-Gate
How Can Obama Fix So Much That Went Wrong?
Happy New Year ...
Out With The Old
Remember The Empty Chairs At Holiday Tables
Who Are The Real Nazis?
The Gaza Rules
Harper's Weekly
The Mortgage Thieves Return
Bullet Points For Assessing The Bush Years
Bye-Bye 2008: Things I Want To Forget
The Fierce Urgency Of Now
How Many Government Workers Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?
The Perils And Joys Of Self-Esteem
The Future Of Civilization
'Hunk' Obama Can Help Nation Fight Obesity Epidemic
Moral Clarity In Gaza
Obama's Tax Cuts Leave Logic Behind
Talking About Sex-Ed That Works
The Time Is Now
Et Al Ad Nauseam: 2008 And All That
The Generational Theft Act Of 2009
Pay Rod Gives Democrats Fits With Senate Choice
'Tis The Season To Be Jolly. Or At least Try
Hey, Caroline -- You'Re Not Entitled
Hamas Rockets Blew Away Gaza Opportunity
Season's Readings
Old Acquaintances
A Social Trauma For Obama: Youth Crime
Sensitivity And 'Gran Torino'
A Question For My Friend Alan Dershowitz
The Unsung Hero Of Obama'S Victory
Red Ink Did Me Good
Barack in Limbo
A Hard Year Ahead
Ask Not For Plum Political Appointments
Eric Holder And All Political Prisoners
Mideast Overshadows Obama's Prospects
Enough About My Hair Already
Year-End Odds And Ends
Curing The New Year's Eve Hangover
The Gamble in Gaza -- Interview With Aaron David Miller
Cal Thomas-Bonus
A Respite From Reality
One Nation, One People-God Bless Us Everyone
Dr. Leavitt's Scary Diagnosis
Teaching Economics
Richardson's Exit And The Vetting Process



Tony Blankley
Daschle-Obama Health Care Possibilities
Tony Blankley 11/26/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook

As President-elect Obama's apparent choice for health and human services secretary and as White House health care czar, it is a fair guess that Tom Daschle's view on health care legislation may be decisive.

So it is worth reading his book "Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis," in which the gracious former Senate leader lays out without equivocation both the policy he recommends and the tactics for how to pass it.

He proposes setting up a board to establish standards for health care delivery in the United States that would be modeled on how the Federal Reserve Board and Securities and Exchange Commission oversee banks and corporations. Technically, it only would oversee the public health systems (Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Health Administration, etc.), which provide about 32 percent of health care nationwide.

On Page 179, he writes, "The Federal Health Board wouldn't be a regulatory agency, but its recommendations would have teeth because all federal health programs would have to abide by them." But here is the kicker: Although his board technically would have no say on the 68 percent of health care that is provided through the private sector, at the bottom of Page 179, Daschle modestly
adds: "Congress could opt to go further with the Board's recommendations. It could, for example, link the tax exclusion for health insurance to insurance that complies with the Board's recommendation."

Those last 19 words would spell the end of independent private-sector health care in America. Obviously, no health insurance would be sold if it were denied the tax deduction. Thus, every policy, every standard decided by this board would be the law of the land for every drug company, every hospital, every doctor and every health insurance company.

Indeed, 20 pages later, in the section in which he identifies "losers" under his plan, Daschle is admirably candid. Among the explicit "losers,” he includes: "Doctors and patients might resent any encroachment on their ability to choose certain treatments, even if they are expensive or ineffectual compared to alternatives. Some insurers might object to new rules that restrict their coverage decisions. And the health-care industry would have to reconsider its business plan (emphasis added)." That is to say, they can stay in business and deliver their services, but only as the government bureaucrats say they may. They no longer would be genuinely independent.

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
Gross National Problems
By Pat Bagley - Salt Lake Tribune * Posted 11/21/2008 12:00:00 AM
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
Gross National Problems
© Copyright 2008  Pat Bagley - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: John Handforth  on Thursday, November 27, 2008

Yes, I can see it now...

Medicare, sadly, is now my primary insurance, which costs me $1200 a year.  My secondary insurance costs my former employer $8800 a year.  I am just a man that worked 38 years in the same industry.  My employer changed four times, but that was partly due to government interference and then to mergers afterwards.

Essentially, I worked for the same employer, even though the name changed.  We were not as smart as the UAW, though, because we gave up many wage increases for better medical coverage.  That will be taken away through government interference, because I am a senior citizen and not important enough in the political environment.

You can bet your bippy that no member of Congress will be denied any procedure because they are so important to the Country.  Can't you just see it now?  I'd be denied prostate surgery, but Joe Biden could get a penile implant if he wants one.  I'd like to perform that surgery, but I'd probably put it in the wrong place.


Posted By: Ken Busch  on Sunday, November 30, 2008

I prefer our present system where a doctor or clinics' staff haggle with an insurance company until they give give up & the patient then continues the haggling until the unlikely event of payment or the patient's exhaustion and exasperation kick in.  Those without insurance get charged several times what the insurance companies haggle the hospitals for which leads to the uninsured going bankrupt & the gov't & the insured pick up these tabs which leads to higher insurance costs on the "lucky" insured.  



All this stress also makes all of us sicker but at least the insurance companies don't need a bailout.


Posted By: K. Quinlan  on Sunday, November 30, 2008

For a while there, I worried that Mr. Blankley would agree with Sen. Daschel.  Here are a few of my complaints with the book.  He acts like that 2000 WHO study in which the U.S.A ranked 37th in health care is meaningful.It is based on certain opinion criteria only.  It is questionnaire based! -  patients, doctors, experts opinions. That is, no out come data, no facts. Here is some outcome data  The U.K.'s  5-year survival rate for breast cancer is 50% ours.  Yes, 1/2 ours.  Prostate Cancer: U.K. 57% of those diagnosed will die. USA 19% die, Germany 46%. France 44%.  Facts and outcome data - more useful for decision making any day.

One payer health care is socialized medicine - Europe and others are backing off from it and privitizing what they can.  U.K. got the point and now has 300 private hospitals. Copenhagen has privitized 1 hospital and is in the process of privitizing the other 7 in the capital city. U.K. has 1/3rd the people per l00,000 in dialysis as we do. Only 1 in 50 of the over 65 year olds ever get surgery for their lung cancer.

All this this comes from a book by 3 economist who study this for a living.  Lives at Risk - a Survey of Single Payer Health Care around the Globe.  Goodman, Musgrave and Herrick, 2002.  National Center for Policy Analysis. A major eye opener, worth the time.


Posted By: K. Quinlan  on Sunday, November 30, 2008

For a while there, I worried that Mr. Blankley would agree with Sen. Daschel. Saw him present the book on CNNs Book TV. He acts like that 2000 WHO study in which the U.S.A ranked 37th in health care is meaningful. It is based on certain opinion criteria only.  It is questionnaire based! -  patients, doctors, experts opinions. That is, no out come data, no facts.  Here are some outcome data.  The U.K.'s  5-year survival rate for breast cancer is 50% ours.  Yes, 1/2 ours.  Prostate Cancer: U.K. 57% of those diagnosed will die. USA 19% die, Germany 46%. France 44%.  Facts and outcome data - more useful for decision making any day.

One payer health care is socialized medicine - Europe and others are backing off from it and privitizing what they can.  U.K. got the point and now has 300 private hospitals. Copenhagen has privitized 1 hospital and is in the process of privitizing the other 7 in the capital city. U.K. has 1/3rd the people per l00,000 in dialysis as we do. Only 1 in 50 of the over 65 year olds ever get surgery for their lung cancer.

All this this comes from a book by 3 economist who study this for a living.  Lives at Risk - a Survey of Single Payer Health Care around the Globe.  Goodman, Musgrave and Herrick, 2002.  National Center for Policy Analysis. A major eye opener, worth the time.

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:

 
Please contact your local newspaper editor if you would like to see the Tony Blankley column in your hometown paper.





© Cagle Cartoons, Inc., All Rights Reserved; Artwork and Columns © each respective artist and writer.